From: blakes7-d-request@lysator.liu.se Subject: blakes7-d Digest V00 #132 X-Loop: blakes7-d@lysator.liu.se X-Mailing-List: archive/volume00/132 Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary="----------------------------" To: blakes7-d@lysator.liu.se Reply-To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se ------------------------------ Content-Type: text/plain blakes7-d Digest Volume 00 : Issue 132 Today's Topics: Re: [B7L] Food, Folks & Fun [B7L] Poor Tarrant (was FLAG test) Re: [B7L] Food, Folks & Fun [B7L] Re: correction of onelist info (was projectavalon list) Fwd: [B7L] FINALACT & teletubbies? ??Age?? [B7L] Re: blakes7-d Digest V00 #131 is that it then? Last days of Pompeii - Orac and Star One Re: [B7L] ??Age?? [B7L] Traitorous Blake Re: [B7L] Orac and Star One Re: [B7L] ??Age?? Re: [B7L] ??Age?? [B7L] Re: blakes7-d Digest V00 #124: female fans? [B7L] Vertedness (ties in with the series eventually) Re: [B7L] Vertedness (ties in with the series eventually) Re: [B7L] ??Age?? Re: [B7L] Orac and Star One ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 03:58:57 PDT From: "Sally Manton" To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Food, Folks & Fun Message-ID: <20000510105857.42220.qmail@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Dana writes: Avon calls it 'concentrated food' which sounds wonderfully appetising, doesn't it? I haven't made up my mind as to whether this equates to artificially created processed blah (which would make sense from an Alta point of view, what use would *they* have for anything other than the basic nutritional needs?) or something that transmogrifies into a range of weird and wonderful stuffs that the crew very carefully do *not* look too closely into the contents thereof. One also wonders how long it took our original intrepid three to find the food machines and get them working (presumably quite a while before they got *Zen* going, even if you ignore the decidedly impossible time-frame of the first few episodes :-)) What's the betting that (in a remarkable show of unity by the embezzler and the smuggler) Fearless Leader got voted into the job of taste-tester? ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:31:06 -0600 From: "Ellynne G." To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: [B7L] Poor Tarrant (was FLAG test) Message-ID: <20000510.093107.-74757.1.rilliara@juno.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 10 May 2000 03:53:56 PDT "Sally Manton" writes: > After Trish said: > > > Definitely *not* at all thick in the sense of stupid. He's really > fairly > bright IMHO - smart and sharp rather than intellectual or cerebral. > But he > *is* rather badly hobbled by his almost total lack of common sense, > slightly > stolid (to my eyes) way of thinking, and poor people skills I think Tarrant's main problem was an almost complete inability for long range thinking. He could be very intelligent planning certain aspects of a mission, analyzing a problem, or dealing with a given crisis. But he had a way of not thinking about consequences or possible long term events that was staggering (take him and Zeeona, Avon has every right to be upset that Tarrant is risking a military alliance that stands a chance of holding off the Federation _and_ letting them live into ripe old age all for a date with a none too bright redhead he barely knows). As to his people skills, I think those are kind of a mixed bag. Tarrant never seems to get over treating people as fellow soldiers (or should I say subordinates?) in the Federation military with a slight, condescending exception for women he considers noncombatants. OTOH, he could be charming at times. I think it came from his extreme earnestness (sure, he can do subterfuge, but he's otherwise an almost painfully straightforward personality, never hiding his intentions or suspicions). (yes, > yes, > Avon's are nearly as bad, but he does have analytic ability to help > compensate). All of Our Heroes can be amazingly stupid at times > (even Orac! > See the beginning of Blake) Have to say this: that always struck me as too dumb for Orac. I've always wondered if something was taking him over again in that scene or if the little box of lights decided he'd be better off without them. > > It's more that Tarrant wouldn't do such a bad job, but Blake and > (for all > *his* lack of conventional leadership skills) Avon did such an > *extraordinary* good job of keeping them alive in this situation > with half > the galaxy after them (given the odds, the low attrition rate has to > be > called impressive - well, right up till that little shooting party > at GP). > Actually (I know this would take a lot of fun out of the series), they could have had a wonderful survival rate if, in S3, they'd gone into hiding. The food selection may not have been great, but Liberator could have just hung out in a corner of space for a few years. They could have also gone into hiding on some neutral world (don't tell me Orac and Avon toegether can't forge all the necessary documentation), or they _could_ have forged some kind of agreement with the Federation (I'm not reccomending it, but I think Avon could have worked out something where the odds of Servalan killing him were significantly lower than if he accepted the position of co-ruler or whatever it was she was offering [the trick is to have a power base that doesn't directly rival her supreme dictatorness, preferably something she couldn't begin to replicate (like the Clone Masters), that provides a useful alliance but could also provide equally nasty retaliation on its own, not to mention upsetting other supporters if she acted against it]. Mind you, I said _lower_ odds, not nonexistant). Ellynne ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:02:47 -0600 From: "Ellynne G." To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Food, Folks & Fun Message-ID: <20000510.093107.-74757.0.rilliara@juno.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 10 May 2000 03:58:57 PDT "Sally Manton" writes: >What's the betting that (in a remarkable > show of > unity by the embezzler and the smuggler) Fearless Leader got voted > into the > job of taste-tester? > The true reason Jenna wouldn't leave Blake at CP revealed at last. Forget idealism, conscience, and wondering how safe it was to hang out with Avon sans backup. she was thinking, "Oh, no, then he'll expect me to test what's edible and what isn't." Ellynne ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 12:56:25 EDT From: JEB31538@cs.com To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: [B7L] Re: correction of onelist info (was projectavalon list) Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I had said earlier: I know nothing about projectavalon, but there are six other B7 groups at onelist. Blakes-7 Bailey's group (The list is just quiet these days.) blakes7 Kristin's group Blakes_7 Joe Young's group, has only three members blake-avon7 Peja's group DownandSafe a list for discussing Blake with no character bashing allowed RallyingCall a Blake print APA that went electronic last year ***** I errored with DownandSafe. MY emphasis is Blake, not the group's. It should read: DownandSafe a list for discussing Blake's 7 with no character bashing allowed Joyce Bowen JEB31538@cs.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 14:52:40 EDT From: B7Morrigan@aol.com To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Fwd: [B7L] FINALACT & teletubbies? Message-ID: <7c.552d836.264b09f8@aol.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_7c.552d836.264b09f8_boundary" --part1_7c.552d836.264b09f8_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > >From: Jacqueline Thijsen > > >The Teletubbies are still ours, though. > > > > In a secret > > hideout a couple of desks away from me, from the looks of things... > > Worried > > Joanne > > Greetings to the all Dreadful one and her fellow worshippers of the one true > Travis. > I shudder to think of Travis, either the one true Travis as described, or > the good-looking one with a chest, with Teletubbies. > > Target practice? Pull! Oh, there goes Tinky-Winky! > Let's put Po under interrogation and see if we can make him talk. Real > words, damn it, not that babbling nonsense! > > Oh, the baby sunface is dropping. It's time for bed... > Trish > SCHOOL > > "Auron may be different, Cally, but on Earth it is considered ill-mannered > to kill your friends while committing suicide." > --part1_7c.552d836.264b09f8_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: From: B7Morrigan@aol.com Full-name: B7 Morrigan Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 01:58:41 EDT Subject: Re: [B7L] FINALACT & teletubbies? To: j_macqueen@hotmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 105 > >From: Jacqueline Thijsen > >The Teletubbies are still ours, though. > > In a secret > hideout a couple of desks away from me, from the looks of things... > Worried > Joanne Greetings to the all Dreadful one and her fellow worshippers of the one true Travis. I shudder to think of Travis, either the one true Travis as described, or the good-looking one with a chest, with Teletubbies. Target practice? Pull! Oh, there goes Tinky-Winky! Let's put Po under interrogation and see if we can make him talk. Real words, damn it, not that babbling nonsense! Oh, the baby sunface is dropping. It's time for bed... Trish SCHOOL "Auron may be different, Cally, but on Earth it is considered ill-mannered to kill your friends while committing suicide." --part1_7c.552d836.264b09f8_boundary-- ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:05:06 +0100 From: "DragonFly" To: , Subject: ??Age?? Message-ID: <00e401bfbb1f$9fec3160$2305883e@oemcomputer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, Just a quick question : Am I the youngest reader on the list at 23? ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 13:11:44 -0700 (PDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Carolan?= To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: [B7L] Re: blakes7-d Digest V00 #131 Message-ID: <20000510201144.22134.qmail@web1702.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Steve Rogerson said: > > Ariana said: "Judith, can you replace "Redemption" > with "Deliverence" > throughout?" > > Please don't ROFL !! Nice one, Steve. oh no, *never* get those two confused.... Sorry Ariana, as you're new to B7, you may not 'get' that, - they're both conventions, Deliverance in 1998 and Redemption in 1999 & 2001. Carolan Redemption: The Blake's 7 and Babylon 5 convention 23-25 February 2001, Ashford, Kent http://www.smof.com/redemption __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:14:55 +0100 From: "DragonFly" To: , Subject: is that it then? Message-ID: <00e601bfbb20$fe7cc2c0$2305883e@oemcomputer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all Is that it then, no more episodes to look forward to on a Sataudays? ?Julia -Loughborough ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 10:03:40 +0100 From: "DragonFly" To: , Subject: Last days of Pompeii - Message-ID: <00e801bfbb27$cdd266a0$2305883e@oemcomputer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit When I was young, so I can't remember it that well, but my mum and dad let me stay up to see a 2 part tv film called Last days of Pompeii - I have just scene that Stephen Greif starred in a film by the same name. The one I really saw when I was little was about the eruption of the volcano. Was this the same film that he was in...does anyone know where I could get hold of a copy of the film? it is about 5 hours long.? Julia - Loughborough ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 17:07:51 -0400 From: "Christine+Steve" To: "Blakes 7 List" Subject: Orac and Star One Message-ID: <001501bfbac3$e1eda460$e5249ad8@cgorman> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01BFBAA2.46B99920" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01BFBAA2.46B99920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've been enjoying going through some of the scripts from the series and = I'm up to Countdown, where the search for Star One really begins with = Blake going after Provine. One thing I was wondering about though, is why Orac couldn't find Star = One for them. Every computer in the known Federation is supposed to use = Tarriel cells, allowing Orac access to their data. I would guess the = systems on Star One would be no different. I would have thought he = would have been able to intercept commands going in and out of Star One, = and easily been able to trace them. =20 Guess it just wouldn't have been as enjoyable for the viewer if Blake = just turned on Orac and asked him, rather then go through the "chase"! = :-) ps. I think Countdown is one of my favourite episodes - great Avon = storyline. Steve Dobson The Blakes7 Files http://webhome.idirect.com/~cgorman/b7/index.htm ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01BFBAA2.46B99920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've been enjoying going through some of the scripts = from the=20 series and I'm up to Countdown, where the search for Star One really = begins with=20 Blake going after Provine.
 
One thing I was wondering about though, is why Orac = couldn't=20 find Star One for them.  Every computer in the known Federation is = supposed=20 to use Tarriel cells, allowing Orac access to their data. I would = guess=20 the systems on Star One would be no different.  I would have = thought he=20 would have been able to intercept commands going in and out of Star One, = and=20 easily been able to trace them. 
 
Guess it just wouldn't have been as enjoyable for = the viewer=20 if Blake just turned on Orac and asked him, rather then go through the=20 "chase"!  :-)
 
ps.  I think Countdown is one of my favourite = episodes -=20 great Avon storyline.
 
 
Steve Dobson
The Blakes7 Files
http://webhome.= idirect.com/~cgorman/b7/index.htm
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01BFBAA2.46B99920-- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 17:32:56 EDT From: B7Morrigan@aol.com To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] ??Age?? Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Just a quick question : Am I the youngest reader on the list at 23? Chronologically or emotionally? I think some of us are quite a bit younger than that ... Trish SCHOOL "Auron may be different, Cally, but on Earth it is considered ill-mannered to kill your friends while committing suicide." ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 17:59:41 EDT From: JEB31538@cs.com To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se, freedom-city@blakes-7.org Subject: [B7L] Traitorous Blake Message-ID: <68.367134c.264b35cd@cs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I did not see the CINESCAPE TODAY report on the new B7 movie. In fact, I don't even know what issue it was in. However, in a newsletter that I get here in the US, there was a summary of the CT article and this sentence appears: "However, as shown in the final episode, the traitorous Blake will still be quite dead though the team will retain the name." It is unclear to me whether this is EXACTLY what the article said or if the n/l writer is simply paraphrasing. I am always appalled at news items calling Blake a traitor. I can remember when the RADIO TIMES talked about BLAKE'S 7 being first repeated on Gold back in 1994 (or 1995 ?) and it referred to Blake as having turned traitor at the end. I not only think this is a gross misinterpretation of the final episode, but that it is a slur on the whole series. I see the final episode as one gigantic misunderstanding with both Blake and Avon contributing to the tragedy. Avon shoots Blake because he thinks that Blake is a traitor, and he soon afterwards learns his error as Blake lies dead at his feet. I think the view that Blake was a traitor cheapens the entire series and ruins the impact of the conclusion. And, if this is the view that the BBC has about BLAKE'S 7, then it should be corrected. I only see things much later than they appear, especially if they originiate in the UK. Whether you are a fan of Blake the character or not, I would hope that when you see this terrible misleading labeling of Blake in future print items, that you would take the time to write to the offender and correct the statement as soon as you see it in print. I really don't think it helps the reputation of the series to have people believing the rebel they first see in "The Way Forward" will become a traitor by episode 52. Joyce Bowen JEB31538@cs.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:09:15 -0700 From: Nick Moffitt To: Blakes 7 List Subject: Re: [B7L] Orac and Star One Message-ID: <20000510150915.T25607@zork.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii begin Christine+Steve quotation: > One thing I was wondering about though, is why Orac couldn't find > Star One for them. Every computer in the known Federation is > supposed to use Tarriel cells, allowing Orac access to their > data. I would guess the systems on Star One would be no > different. I would have thought he would have been able to > intercept commands going in and out of Star One, and easily been > able to trace them. I'm not sure that Orac *couldn't* find Star One, but rather that he *didn't*. If written into a corner, I'm sure that Nation, Boucher, et al would have just pulled out "You never asked!". -- CrackMonkey.Org - Non-sequitur arguments and ad-hominem personal attacks LinuxCabal.Org - Co-location facilities and meeting space Pigdog.Org - The Online Handbook for Bad People of the Future You are not entitled to your opinions. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:12:18 -0700 From: Nick Moffitt To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] ??Age?? Message-ID: <20000510151218.U25607@zork.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii begin B7Morrigan@aol.com quotation: > > Just a quick question : Am I the youngest reader on the list at > > 23? > > Chronologically or emotionally? > > I think some of us are quite a bit younger than that ... Ah, the conspiracy of 23-year-olds! Why, all of us in the Monday-Night B7 marathons in San Francisco are 23. -- CrackMonkey.Org - Non-sequitur arguments and ad-hominem personal attacks LinuxCabal.Org - Co-location facilities and meeting space Pigdog.Org - The Online Handbook for Bad People of the Future You are not entitled to your opinions. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 17:19:50 -0500 (CDT) From: Tegan Donnelly To: B7 list Subject: Re: [B7L] ??Age?? Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > Ah, the conspiracy of 23-year-olds! Why, all of us in the > Monday-Night B7 marathons in San Francisco are 23. Add another 23 year old to the group, though I found B7 around 21 or so (and I'm not in SanFran). I think. I honestly can't remember anymore, I feel like I've been a fan for a very long time. :) Sorry for the me too. I couldn't pass this one up though. Uh, ObB7: What do you think the crew was doing in their early 20's? When would you think schooling ended and more adult commitments took place? cheers, tegan (*) tegan@offcenter.org http://offcenter.org/~tegan There are worlds out there where the sky is burning; where the seas sleep and the rivers dream. People made of smoke and cities made of song. Somewhere there's danger. Somewhere there's injustice. And somewhere else the tea is getting cold. Come on, Ace we've got work to do. - the Doctor, Survival ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 17:25:31 -0700 From: Helen Krummenacker To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: [B7L] Re: blakes7-d Digest V00 #124: female fans? Message-ID: <3919FDFA.54@jps.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > That's one of the many reasons why Avon has so many female fans--many of > us > > are fascinated by someone who has entirely abandoned the burden that > > being/trying to be nice places on us. > > But I stopped being nice years ago, and I haven't got any female fans at > all:( > > Neil > Neil, have you forgotten all those marriage offers you got a month or so ago? ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:03:16 -0700 From: Helen Krummenacker To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: [B7L] Vertedness (ties in with the series eventually) Message-ID: <391A06D4.330C@jps.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit SInce we're back on the discussion... why are INTs considered 'less nice'? Because we don't like to spend a lot of time on mindless social interaction? I sit next to a fellow at work who is undoubtable ESTJ. I have to answer all of his polite sociable questions five or more times because he forgets the answers. He isn't paying attention, which to me means he is the one who DOESN'T care. I don't initiate many idle conversations because I respect my colleagues and do not wish to waste their valuable time, nor neglect my function in the company. I have a chronic condition that makes me occaisionally require assistance getting around... the E's never notice or care, but my more introverted colleagues are most likely to offer some kind of help. How do we define 'nice' and 'caring'? Is Vila nicer than Avon? Vila was often making unwanted passes at his female friends whereas Avon allowed Dayna to initiate a kiss, but never presses himself on anyone. Blake is 'nicer', but laughs about Vila as being like an intelligeent flea (with Avon). And... Why must one act irrational to prove one cares? Avon saved the lives of his friends on several occaisions, even though he went into danger. I don't know that I would have had the courage to go down into many of the situations he did. I also doubt I'd be able to put someone out an airlock to break out of a dangerous orbit. We know Avon was willing to, but what about his nicer colleagues? And then Servalan is an extrovert, very professionally good at being 'nice' as she manipulates people, but we know she cares nothing for them. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 23:42:26 EDT From: B7Morrigan@aol.com To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Vertedness (ties in with the series eventually) Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I see Helen's point, and as an INTP/J (depending on when I take the damn test) I concur with most of it. However, much as I love Avon, he does not demonstrate a particular talent for empathy, which is often associated with being nice. He won't bring you roses (unless he wants something) but he'll save your life. Hmm, it reminds me of the "But honey, you needed new car mats. I don't understand why you don't like your birthday gift." Trish SCHOOL "Auron may be different, Cally, but on Earth it is considered ill-mannered to kill your friends while committing suicide." ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 19:49:19 +0930 From: "Minnie" To: "Tegan Donnelly" , "B7 list" Subject: Re: [B7L] ??Age?? Message-ID: <011601bfbb32$5eab3260$1eae3acb@marina> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit tegan wrote: Add another 23 year old to the group, though I found B7 around 21 or so (and I'm not in SanFran). I think. I honestly can't remember anymore, I feel like I've been a fan for a very long time. :) > I used to watch it when I was a kid, at roughly 9 years old (im now 29) and I remember that the first crush I >ever had (the absolute truth) was on Avon. I was sooooooooo jealous when a school mate got a photo from >PD (keeping in mind we are wayyyyyyyyyy down in South Australia, thats down under, down under ) I >plotted and thought about how to pinch it from her. Ah those were the days :)) >Then I forgot about it, and I had a touch of the nostalgias early last year when I found a set in a video store, I >havent looked back since. Now I cant get enough. And yes, I still have a crush on Avon. >Min. xxx ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 07:06:58 +0200 From: Steve Kilbane To: "Christine+Steve" cc: "Blakes 7 List" Subject: Re: [B7L] Orac and Star One Message-Id: <200005110606.HAA23471@whitecrow.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > One thing I was wondering about though, is why Orac couldn't find Star > One for them. Every computer in the known Federation is supposed to use > Tarriel cells, allowing Orac access to their data. I would guess the > systems on Star One would be no different. I would have thought he > would have been able to intercept commands going in and out of Star One, > and easily been able to trace them. A couple of reasons come to mind. First, it might not have used TCs, although that's unlikely. Secondly, the transmissions might be carried mechanically before being transmitted, such as in a spaceship. (unlikely, but that's the joys of rationalisation). Multiple transmission points and broadcast response signals would give no fixed place for the computation units. Finally, Orac might have searched the likely area - the galaxy - and found nothing. Starting on the rest of the universe outside the galaxy might have taken a bit more commitment from the crew. :-) steve -------------------------------- End of blakes7-d Digest V00 Issue #132 **************************************