From: blakes7-d-request@lysator.liu.se Subject: blakes7-d Digest V00 #204 X-Loop: blakes7-d@lysator.liu.se X-Mailing-List: archive/volume00/204 Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary="----------------------------" To: blakes7-d@lysator.liu.se Reply-To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se ------------------------------ Content-Type: text/plain blakes7-d Digest Volume 00 : Issue 204 Today's Topics: RE: [B7L] aussies Re: [B7L] Zenith & Sally Knyvette Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Re: winspit quarry trip Re: [B7L] out-takes Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Re: winspit quarry trip (Oz members) Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Revolutions past [B7L] Nexus 2000 Re: [B7L] aussies Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Zenith & Sally Knyvette [B7L] Avatars [B7L] A Patriotic Fourth [B7L] Darrow in Dr.Who Re: [B7L] Revolutions past [B7L] Spin List Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Darrow in Dr.Who Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Darrow in Dr.Who Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Revolutions past - so off topic we should be kicked off by now. Re: [B7L] Better late than never Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Re: [B7L] Re: potential Gareth Thomas sighting ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:12:18 +1000 From: "Michelle Wilcox" To: "blake's seven" Subject: RE: [B7L] aussies Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>>>>Melbournites all. >>>>>(except me ) >>>>>Min.xxx I might be a bit late in on this, but I'm in Brisbane. Michelle ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 19:19:21 EDT From: Pherber@aol.com To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Zenith & Sally Knyvette Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 7/13/00 9:56:02 PM Mountain Daylight Time, rilliara@juno.com writes: > And he and his "I don't know where I'm going, what direction I'm headed > in, or how long it will take" vacation plans are not going to win my > sympathy. Neither will his withhold information for the good of others > (roughly equivilant to "Why would I have left the folder on your desk? I > didn't know you were going to need it. How was I supposed to know you > sent a memo? What standard operating procedure? I was only gone for two > weeks.") story. In other words, behaving pretty much like your average programmer....You're right -- not much sympathy deserved! Nina (a tester at wits end with a bunch of programmers) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 19:27:10 -0400 From: "Dana Shilling" To: Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <006201bfef7d$9f665ee0$74ac4e0c@dshilling> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Fiona said: > > > >I think Sleer would pay by credit card, myself. Or handfuls of fish bones. > > > answer to American Express be "Federal Express"?)). > > Murder on the Federal Express. Hm, I like the ring of that... that's why they need the teleport system. "Federal Express. When it absolutely, positively has to be there already." -(Y) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:43:06 EST From: "Jessica Taylor" To: Blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Re: winspit quarry trip Message-ID: <20000717004306.11289.qmail@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed >From: "Minnie" >To: "Jessica Taylor" , >Subject: Re: [B7L] Re: winspit quarry trip >Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:45:41 +0930 > > > > > >>Let me guess Jessica, Melbourne?? > >> > >>Min.xxx > > > >How did you guess that? > > > >Jessica > > >Nothing mysterious. Everyone else seemed to be, so I thought you might be >as >well > >Min.xxx Oh, no magic or secret spy operations then, I must say that I'm a little disappointed. Oh well, good guess Jessica > ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 06:43:18 +1000 From: Kathryn Andersen To: "Blake's 7 list" Subject: Re: [B7L] out-takes Message-ID: <20000717064318.A28021@welkin.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 04:56:26PM +0000, Ika wrote: > > what was real and what she dreamed. (The other week she dreamed > Judith Proctor - who she's never met - came to live with us and > looked exactly like Kasabi.) I can assure you, she doesn't look like Kasabi. (-8 -- _--_|\ | Kathryn Andersen / \ | http://www.foobox.net/~kat \_.--.*/ | http://jove.prohosting.com/~rubykat v | #include "standard/disclaimer.h" ------------| Melbourne -> Victoria -> Australia -> Southern Hemisphere Maranatha! | -> Earth -> Sol -> Milky Way Galaxy -> Universe ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 12:32:41 +0100 From: "Nyder" To: "Jessica Taylor" , Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <000001bfefb6$0d37a4a0$3dc628c3@stx.ox.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm starting to think I've wandered onto the off-topic list... > Hmm, come to think of it I don't think the Australian dollar is doing too > well either, although I'm sure our new GST will fix all of > that (snigger). That's what they thought in Canada... and they were right. It fixed the economy, all right... fixed it good and proper. Fiona Fiona Moore http://redrival.com/nyder/indexx.html Resist the Host or your Oneness will be Absorbed ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:35:15 +0100 From: "Nyder" To: "Neil Faulkner" , "b7" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <000301bfefb6$0f79f380$3dc628c3@stx.ox.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- Original Message ----- From: Neil Faulkner > From: Una McCormack > > I take it we're not including the Napoleonic wars in that particular > tally? > > It makes you wonder just how much of the world a war's got to cover before > it counts as a world war. I've heard some people refer to the wars of the 1630s/40s as a world war, just cos there was some sort of conflict going on just about everywhere there's records at that point. Fiona Fiona Moore http://redrival.com/nyder/indexx.html Resist the Host or your Oneness will be Absorbed ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:30:52 +0100 From: "Nyder" To: , "Penny Dreadful" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <000201bfefb6$0ec151e0$3dc628c3@stx.ox.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- Original Message ----- From: Penny Dreadful To: Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past > At 11:55 PM 7/15/00 +0100, Nyder wrote: > > >did you know, there was an > >American game show years back which had a quiz category entitled "Dead or > >Canadian?" in which contestants had to guess whether a named individual was > >dead or Canadian. > > Did they specify which state of being was preferable? I never actually witnessed this show myself, I just read about it in an article somewhere. We'd better ask our American cousins :). > Live From The Birthplace Of Robert Goulet, > Penny Live from the Birthplace of Nobody In Particular [i.e., Croydon], Fiona Fiona Moore St Cross College, Oxford http://redrival.com/nyder/ Liberte - Egalite - Postmodernite ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 12:51:21 +0100 From: "Nyder" To: "Andrew Ellis" , "b7" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <000101bfefb6$0df7e760$3dc628c3@stx.ox.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Ellis To: b7 Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 11:36 PM Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past > It's far easier to chant "Two world > >wars and one world cup" than to face the fact that Britain has fought three > >world wars and failed to win any of them. > > > >Neil > > > Erm, I am terminally stupid, but..... I don't speak French, Dutch or German > as my first language. Nor do I (though I do speak two of those as second and third languages), and I fail to see what that's got to do with facing up to Britain's poor showing in the past three world wars (not to mention world cups...). Come to that, I'm not sure what it has to do with one's intelligence, either. > Resident of an island not successfully invaded since Henry Tudor. Unless you count the Americans. Resident of the same island, Fiona Fiona Moore http://redrival.com/nyder/indexx.html Resist the Host or your Oneness will be Absorbed ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 19:42:47 +0100 From: "Neil Faulkner" To: "b7" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <000201bfefc2$751b98e0$e535fea9@neilfaulkner> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andrew Ellis > It's far easier to chant "Two world > >wars and one world cup" than to face the fact that Britain has fought three > >world wars and failed to win any of them. > > > >Neil > > > Erm, I am terminally stupid, but..... I don't speak French, Dutch or German > as my first language. Who said anything about losing? Simply being on the winning side is not, in my book, grounds for claiming victory. Neil ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:34:53 +1000 From: "David Henderson" To: Subject: Re: [B7L] Re: winspit quarry trip (Oz members) Message-ID: <005001bfefc1$7f70f8e0$6a3bdb89@lemon.jcu.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----Original Message----- From: Joanne To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Date: Monday, 17 July 2000 12:19 Subject: Re: [B7L] Re: winspit quarry trip >>> >>> >>> >> >>>Me. :-) >>Me too. >>Jessica > >And me as well - though I am mainly a lurker. >Joanne (another one) Well I might as well stick my hand up. DaveH (Wow, second post this year. Already doubled last year's output) (Actually it was about this time last year that I was hasslin Steve R at Pages Bar. Thanks again Steve.) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 07:38:08 +0100 From: "Nyder" To: "Dana Shilling" , Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <006a01bfefc1$779f04e0$3dc628c3@stx.ox.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Me: > > > answer to American Express be "Federal Express"?)). Dana: > that's why they need the teleport system. "Federal Express. > When it absolutely, positively has to be there already." "...or you'll be getting an unexpected visit from the Supreme Commander. Same day delivery anywhere in the Federation; next day delivery to Auron, Freedom City and Destiny. Cygnus Alphan deliveries may take anywhere from a week to never." Or, to paraphrase an old parody I heard once: "Federal Express. Don't Leave Home." Fiona Fiona Moore http://redrival.com/nyder/indexx.html Resist the Host or your Oneness will be Absorbed ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 07:29:51 +0100 From: "Nyder" To: "Christine+Steve" , "B7 Mailing List" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <006901bfefc1$76ee0460$3dc628c3@stx.ox.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Steve replied to something I said: > If I remember correctly, the British Conservative party recently "borrowed" > their latest plans from Ontario. I read an interesting article in the Economist last summer which pointed out that New Labour's reform policies were effectively remodeling the British parliamentary system along Canadian lines: a government-appointed House of Lords/Senate, more power to the economic capital city, devolution for the noisy countries/provinces off in the corner there, centre-leftist governance, etc. Hm... >The "Common Sense Revolution" was started > here in Ontario by the ruling Progressive Conservatives in 1998. Got them > elected, But it sounds so much more convincing coming from Mike Harris than from William Hague (mind you, it would sound more convincing coming from a *hamster* than from William Hague...) > Guess they think Ontario is now similar to Britain. What that says about the state of OHIP I shudder to think. Fiona Fiona Moore http://redrival.com/nyder/indexx.html Resist the Host or your Oneness will be Absorbed ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:35:25 +0100 From: "Una McCormack" To: "b7" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <00ed01bfefc9$fc84cd90$0d01a8c0@codex> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Neil wrote: > From: Andrew Ellis > > > It's far easier to chant "Two world > > >wars and one world cup" than to face the fact that Britain has fought three > > >world wars and failed to win any of them. > > > > > >Neil > > > > > > Erm, I am terminally stupid, but..... I don't speak French, Dutch or German > > as my first language. > > Who said anything about losing? Simply being on the winning side is not, in > my book, grounds for claiming victory. Must... not... bite... Well, I'm just not even going to open the subject of WW2 because, as you can probably guess Neil, I don't agree with you, and I reckon you can work out why. WW1 is more debatable, and I think it's the peace that was really fucked up. I just really want your first 'world war' clarified. I think you argued cogently that the AWI was 'just one theatre in a global conflict', but your response to my suggestion that perhaps you weren't giving the whole picture of the wars with France was a bit of a cheat, as your use of the term 'world war' seemed suddenly rather malleable! From Linda Collee, 'Britons', p. 300-301 (Vintage, 1996): 'More than twice as long as the First and Second World Wars added together, the wars against Revolutionary and Napoleonic France were almost as geographically extensive as far as British involvement was concerned, sweeping through Europe, into Asia, Africa, North America, Latin America, and even precipitating sea battles of the coast of Australia.' I'm not going to claim that everything throughout the 19th century was just super-duper in Britain, but I can't see how you can claim that Britain emerged from these wars 'simply... on the winning side'. Taking a guess at the reason why you claim WW2 was *not* a victory for Britain (economic and political decline), it seems the reverse is true after 1815. Una ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 06:21:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "rita d'orac" To: Blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: [B7L] Nexus 2000 Message-ID: <382142663.963829293438.JavaMail.root@web303-mc.mail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A big apology to those of you who had trouble accessing the Nexus 2000 pics on my site - someone has now taught me how to do thumbnails and how to use Netscape friendly names and directories... Easy to load pics are now up on http://www.vilaworld.com Sorry again... rita d'orac "If you think of this mouse as a space captain..." http://www.vilaworld.com ______________________________________________ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:24:24 +1000 From: Joanne To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] aussies Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >Darren wrote: > >>Me too ! From Melbourne (not the Florida one), Victoria, (not the Canada >>one), Australia (accept no substitute). > >Melbournites all. >(except me ) > >Min.xxx Actually, I'm from Sydney. Joanne -- ‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚ Because I love it. It takes me to the stars, to the moon, on any journey I can imagine. Any place but here ... Cyrano de Bergerac ‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚‚ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:56:34 -0400 (EDT) From: sjk3@cornell.edu To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >> Live From The Birthplace Of Robert Goulet, >> Penny > > Live from the Birthplace of Nobody In Particular [i.e., Croydon], > > Fiona Wasn't Sarah Jane Smith from Croydon? Sandra Kisner sjk3@cornell.edu ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:04:25 GMT From: "Mat Shayde" To: penberriss@yahoo.com, blakes7@hotmail.com, blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Zenith & Sally Knyvette Message-ID: <20000717150425.58626.qmail@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Jurgen and Wendy wrote: > > Finally, I really enjoy the scene when she smiles at > > Avon because she's > > beating him at the game (What's the name of the > > game?). This is Jenna at her > > best, showing that she can beat Avon any time. :-) > >I think you're reading too much into it. Fact is, she >doesn't have much to do in the story, so she doesn't >do much. > >Wendy Since when was reading too much into things a crime? :) If it was then this list would never have any posting! :) Dorian - "You mean you're here by choice?" ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:52:37 -0600 From: "Ellynne G." To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: [B7L] Avatars Message-ID: <20000717.102345.-98625.0.rilliara@juno.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Minor spoilers for two books ahead. I was looking through Garth Nix's "Seventh Tower: The Fall" and saw the preview for the next book, "Castle." I'm not going to explain the background, just say that one character is getting dragged off to what I think was called The Hall of Nightmares, which seems to be the castle torture chambers. I should also mention that magic using characters in this castle each have a mystical Shadow (no relation [probably] to B7) creature bound to them that helps heal them when they're wounded as well as do other work. OK, door to the Hall of Nightmares opens, reveiling a guy even the guards are scared stiff of. When he was described as a tall man with black hair and very pale skin whose attitude to the guards was somewhat sardonic, you can imagine who I thought of. Then it mentioned an odd deformity he had. Apparently, about half of one side of his body had a major accident. His Shadow servant, unable to heal it, keeps him alive by essentially filling in for that half of his body, giving him an insectlike arm and other characteristics that keep him from getting invited to parties much (as a consequence, he takes a certain satisfaction in how his current job keeps everyone scared to death of him). So, kind of 'if Avon were Travis.' And, with only the mildest of spoilers on the new Harry Potter book (which still qualifies as a full fledged warning for those who haven't read the book), Snape reminds me a lot more of Avon than he did before. Ellynne ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:23:42 -0600 From: "Ellynne G." To: Blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: [B7L] A Patriotic Fourth Message-ID: <20000717.102345.-98625.1.rilliara@juno.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Since I got perhaps a touch over cynical the other day (I can't help it. Anything and everything to do with Clinton does that to me [it's not so much his complete lack of ethics, it's people who shrug and go, "And what's wrong with that?"]), I'm going to go the other way. First off, special mention of one Revolutionary War leader (whose name I should remember, but can't) who never won a single battle but happened to win his particular war, a scenario I make particular mention of since it might provide writers with some idea how to do a PGP that turns the fourth season around (the guy did it by drawing the British into relatively meaningless engagements further and further into deep swamp land. By the end, the British had conquored a great deal of swamp and apparently brought many malaria bearing mosquitoes under their rule, not to mention sunk a good many wagons in the mire [so I don't know how to turn the fourth season into an ongoing battle that cost the Federation more than it was worth and that relocated needed troops, I just got started on the idea]). Let's put in a special mention for old idealism (hey, we all know Blake formed his political attitudes watching old films from the midtwentieth century, especially Frank Capra - and he probably loved Jimmy Stewart). And, although I think the U.K.'s flag is lovely (and I will admit, under pressure, that ours does have a strong 18th century artistic sense that is perhaps a bit much by modern standards, though it's nice to have a flag that's easy to spot [half the point of The Star Spangled Banner]), I'm very fond of the symbolism behind ours (side issue: political implications in the various rebellions in B7 having no flag or symbol of their own [other than Blake]. Did this reflect a lack of unity [all groups apparently fighting under their own, already in use, local standards], a feeling that they were only out to reform the system instead of overthrow it, or some other factor [perhaps they asked the Liberator's unknown fashion designer to come up with something but could never quite bring themselves to fight under black leather studded with silver stars]?). Sniff, sniff. Must change subject. There's no way I can make some of the family history stories that are bubbling up connected to B7 (the advantage of doing extensive family history is the way you can tie almost any bit of history, no matter how remote, into a family story). I have a really great one about my great-great grandfather's uncle [through his mother's second marriage] that always comes up at this time of year. But I am getting teary eyed over it. Poor Blake, he would have loved this stuff (connection made! Bet you thought I couldn't do it!). Ellynne ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:57:07 -0400 From: "Christine+Steve" To: "B7 Mailing List" Subject: [B7L] Darrow in Dr.Who Message-ID: <002e01bff010$1e9cd1c0$b7089ad8@cgorman> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0029_01BFEFEE.83938000" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01BFEFEE.83938000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thought I'd share this. For those who don't know, the BBC has come up with a pretty good Dr Who = area on their website which has reviews of a number of episodes, one of = which was Timelash. You can see the review at = http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/episode_guide/timelash.shtml There are = two pics of Paul Darrow there, one on the main page the other on the = analysis page. Check out the hairdo in the first pic. The review is quite good - but its been too long since I've seen this = episode, so I don't know if its as bad as the early reviews make out. = Apparently Paul attempts to play his character as "an over the top = pastiche of Olivier playing Shakespeare's King Richard", which is = probably quite interesting to see! He's also supposed to get the best = dialogue in the storyline. There is also a review of Doctor Who and the Silurians, Paul's other = episode at http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/episode_guide/silurians.shtml = but he's not mentioned much in that review. Steve Dobson. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01BFEFEE.83938000 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thought I'd share this.
 
For those who don't know, the BBC has come up with a = pretty=20 good Dr Who area on their website which has reviews of a number of = episodes, one=20 of which was Timelash.  You can see the review at http= ://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/episode_guide/timelash.shtml =20 There are two pics of Paul Darrow there, one on the main page = the=20 other on the analysis page.  Check out the hairdo in the first=20 pic.
 
The review is quite good - but its been too long = since I've=20 seen this episode, so I don't know if its as bad as the early reviews = make=20 out.  Apparently Paul attempts to play his character as "an over = the top=20 pastiche of Olivier playing Shakespeare's King Richard", which is = probably quite=20 interesting to see!  He's also supposed to get the best dialogue in = the=20 storyline.
 
There is also a review of Doctor Who and the = Silurians,=20 Paul's other episode at htt= p://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/episode_guide/silurians.shtml but=20 he's not mentioned much in that review.
 
 
Steve Dobson.
 
------=_NextPart_000_0029_01BFEFEE.83938000-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:23:13 -0600 From: Betty Ragan To: Blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <39734F11.5EFDAB98@sdc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nyder wrote: > I'm starting to think I've wandered onto the off-topic list... Hey, speaking of which, can anybody tell me what the address *is* for the off-topic list? -- Betty Ragan ** ragan@sdc.org ** http://www.sdc.org/~ragan/ "Imposing Latin rules on English structure is a little like trying to play baseball in ice skates." -- Bill Bryson ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:36:56 EDT From: Tigerm1019@aol.com To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: [B7L] Spin List Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 07/17/2000 1:24:47 PM Central Daylight Time, ragan@sdc.org writes: > Hey, speaking of which, can anybody tell me what the address *is* for > the off-topic list? The joining instructions are on Judith's page at http://www.hermit.org/Blakes7/ under the link for mailing lists. :-) Hope that helps! Tiger M ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:45:57 +0100 From: "Una McCormack" To: Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <021201bff01f$4fb41e80$0d01a8c0@codex> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Betty: > Hey, speaking of which, can anybody tell me what the address *is* for > the off-topic list? Details at: http://www.hermit.org/Blakes7/Fanclubs/MailNews.html#Spin Una ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:51:32 -0600 From: Betty Ragan To: Blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Darrow in Dr.Who Message-ID: <397355B4.ED3752BA@sdc.org> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------025A66CE14D8C6CB9794D37E" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------025A66CE14D8C6CB9794D37E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Steve Dobson wrote: > The review is quite good - but its been too long since I've seen this episode, so > I don't know if its as bad as the early reviews make out. Apparently Paul > attempts to play his > character as "an over the top pastiche of Olivier playing Shakespeare's King > Richard", which is probably quite interesting to see! He's also supposed to get > the best dialogue in the storyline. It was a pretty dire episode, IMHO, but then (again IMHO) very few of the 6th Doctor episodes rise much above "dire." Actually, I think the best line was when the Doc called Darrow's character a "microcephalic apostate." Especially after I looked up the word "apostate." See, PBS *is* educational! -- Betty Ragan ** ragan@sdc.org ** http://www.sdc.org/~ragan/ "Imposing Latin rules on English structure is a little like trying to play baseball in ice skates." -- Bill Bryson --------------025A66CE14D8C6CB9794D37E Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Received: from samantha.lysator.liu.se (list@samantha.lysator.liu.se [130.236.254.202]) by virgo.sdc.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA23308 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:58:32 -0600 Received: (from list@localhost) by samantha.lysator.liu.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA21626; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 18:57:43 +0200 (MET DST) Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 18:57:43 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: samantha.lysator.liu.se: list set sender to blakes7-request@lysator.liu.se using -f Message-ID: <002e01bff010$1e9cd1c0$b7089ad8@cgorman> From: "Christine+Steve" To: "B7 Mailing List" Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:57:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0029_01BFEFEE.83938000" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Subject: [B7L] Darrow in Dr.Who Resent-Message-ID: <"e8GNnB.A.2RF.Fszc5"@samantha.lysator.liu.se> Resent-From: blakes7@lysator.liu.se X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/27001 X-Loop: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Precedence: list Resent-Sender: blakes7-request@lysator.liu.se This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01BFEFEE.83938000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thought I'd share this. For those who don't know, the BBC has come up with a pretty good Dr Who = area on their website which has reviews of a number of episodes, one of = which was Timelash. You can see the review at = http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/episode_guide/timelash.shtml There are = two pics of Paul Darrow there, one on the main page the other on the = analysis page. Check out the hairdo in the first pic. The review is quite good - but its been too long since I've seen this = episode, so I don't know if its as bad as the early reviews make out. = Apparently Paul attempts to play his character as "an over the top = pastiche of Olivier playing Shakespeare's King Richard", which is = probably quite interesting to see! He's also supposed to get the best = dialogue in the storyline. There is also a review of Doctor Who and the Silurians, Paul's other = episode at http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/episode_guide/silurians.shtml = but he's not mentioned much in that review. Steve Dobson. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01BFEFEE.83938000 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thought I'd share this.
 
For those who don't know, the BBC has come up with a = pretty=20 good Dr Who area on their website which has reviews of a number of = episodes, one=20 of which was Timelash.  You can see the review at http= ://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/episode_guide/timelash.shtml =20 There are two pics of Paul Darrow there, one on the main page = the=20 other on the analysis page.  Check out the hairdo in the first=20 pic.
 
The review is quite good - but its been too long = since I've=20 seen this episode, so I don't know if its as bad as the early reviews = make=20 out.  Apparently Paul attempts to play his character as "an over = the top=20 pastiche of Olivier playing Shakespeare's King Richard", which is = probably quite=20 interesting to see!  He's also supposed to get the best dialogue in = the=20 storyline.
 
There is also a review of Doctor Who and the = Silurians,=20 Paul's other episode at htt= p://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/episode_guide/silurians.shtml but=20 he's not mentioned much in that review.
 
 
Steve Dobson.
 
------=_NextPart_000_0029_01BFEFEE.83938000-- --------------025A66CE14D8C6CB9794D37E-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:56:33 +0100 From: "Neil Faulkner" To: "b7" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <004301bff029$f3e59ce0$e535fea9@neilfaulkner> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Una McCormack > Well, I'm just not even going to open the subject of WW2 because, as you can > probably guess Neil, I don't agree with you, and I reckon you can work out > why. A lot depends on how you classify 'winning'. In a strictly military sense, Britain simply can't field a large enough army to win a world war. As far as WW2 goes, I'd say the war in Europe was primarily won by the Soviet Union, simply due to the sheer scale of the forces deployed on the eastern front. America helped. Britain was there. As for the war against Japan, honours really ought to go to the USA, who took the war to Japan itself (eventually), whilst Britain merely tied down (admittedly sizable) Japanese forces in defence and reclamation of mainland asian colonies. (And don't forget the Chinese.) All references to 'Britain' should also include the Canadian, Australian, New Zealand, Indian etc contributions, which were considerable (to say the least!). The UK effort was hardly the UK on its own. To play down Britain's overall impact on the outcome of the war is not, of course, to denigrate the courage and sacrifice of individual service men and women. What gets up my nose is the tunnel-visioned mentality of union jack-waving morons trying to claim that *England* won the Second World War. (Much the same could be said of the First World War too. The crucial element in the Allied victory was the entry of the United States, seeing as the French army was on the brink of mutiny and the British forces weren't up to achieving much, even with colonial assistance. I'm not happy with the way all attention on that war seems to focus on Flanders, with a sidelong glance at Lawrence in Palestine, when the largest army involved was the Austro-Hungarian, the eastern front gets very short shrift, and the Italian front is almost totally ignored even though tens of thousands of men died there. It's a very disproportionate perspective.) > I just really want your first 'world war' clarified. I think you argued > cogently that the AWI was 'just one theatre in a global conflict', but your > response to my suggestion that perhaps you weren't giving the whole picture > of the wars with France was a bit of a cheat, as your use of the term 'world > war' seemed suddenly rather malleable! Possibly because it is a bit malleable. The 18th/19th Century wars with France are not generally regarded as 'world wars' proper, though their scale makes them useful for facetious argument. Okay - Britain has fought *four* world wars, lost the first hands down, won the second (with foreign help), and played a significant but limited role in the winning of the other two. Neil ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 21:49:03 +0100 From: "Una McCormack" To: "b7" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <023e01bff030$73dddec0$0d01a8c0@codex> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Neil wrote: > Okay - Britain has fought *four* world wars, lost the first hands down, won > the second (with foreign help), and played a significant but limited role in > the winning of the other two. Not as good a soundbite as your original statement, Neil, but I think that's something I could agree on. Should we issue a communique? Una ------------------------------ Date: 17 Jul 2000 14:00:06 -0700 From: "Bob Vinisky" To: "B7 Mailing List" Subject: Re: [B7L] Darrow in Dr.Who Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >There is also a review of Doctor Who and the Silurians, Paul'sΚother episode at http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/episode_guide/ >silurians.shtmlΚbut he's not mentioned much in that review. "Secretary Rontaine" is also in that episode (as the Project Director). I believe he is also in one of the Dalek episodes (Genesis Of The Daleks (?)). In that same ep is one of the Alta's from Redemption (she's one of the freedom fighters). Bob ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 21:28:48 +0100 From: "Andrew Ellis" To: "b7" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <005901bff1c5$92eb2ac0$a745063e@leanet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> It's far easier to chant "Two world >> >wars and one world cup" than to face the fact that Britain has fought >three >> >world wars and failed to win any of them. >> > >> >Neil >> >> >> Erm, I am terminally stupid, but..... I don't speak French, Dutch or >German >> as my first language. > >Nor do I (though I do speak two of those as second and third languages), and >I fail to see what that's got to do with facing up to Britain's poor showing >in the past three world wars (not to mention world cups...). Come to that, >I'm not sure what it has to do with one's intelligence, either. > OK on the world cups, but I'm going to disagree on the last two of the three world wars. Not something for this list though, far to off topic. Gnog ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 22:08:11 +0100 From: "Andrew Ellis" To: "b7" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past - so off topic we should be kicked off by now. Message-ID: <005a01bff1c5$93ccff40$a745063e@leanet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I just said I wasn't going to discuss this, but what the... All the stuff up to this point is relavant, but I hope this snip remind people what was said. >Okay - Britain has fought *four* world wars, lost the first hands down, won >the second (with foreign help), and played a significant but limited role in >the winning of the other two. > >Neil So lets go a little further with an analogy. Football (sorry Soccer) the goal keeper does not score, but keeps a clean sheet. The midfield player who runs down the left with energy and determination distracts TWO defenders. The strikers put the opposition defence on edge, but the winning goal is scored when a defender heads in from a corner by another defender. Who won the match ? The team. Its a team game, the team won, and all of the team members contributed, and they can all claim the victory. WWII. I don't know what would have happened without the British presence in North Africa, or with a significant part of the Luftwaffe not engaged over the skys of Britain. Or what would have happened if the resistance in the Balkans had just caved in, or the Americans had not send supplies over to Europe and Russia before they actually joined the war. Or indeed hat would have happened if the Germans had gone for the southern oil fields rather than the political target of Moscow, or put Rommel on the Eastern front, or the Japanese had solidly taken the "Western Pacific" instead of pearl harbour. And these are just examples. It happened the way it happened, and EVERYTHING that happened played some part in shaping the conflict. It was an ALLIED victory, and ALL contributors, great and small, on the front and back home WON the war. Thank you to everybody, even those people who forget the parts played by the other team members. Yes, even those people now working in Hollywood. So. Back to Blake. In order to judge the success of his high profile operation during series 1 and 2, you need to know what influence he had on other people. Even if he personally failed, his very presence on the team changed things, and could allow something else to happen elsewhere in the galaxy. Perhaps that was the plan. He didn't have enough resources to win, but he was really irritating, with superior fire power and excellent early warning system. He was (by luck) ahead in technology. And the Federation wanted rid of him, for political reasons. You could even view the whole Star One debate in this light. Blake didn't really want to destroy Star One. He wanted the Federation to THINK he was going to destroy Star One. And come after him with the whole fifth legion. Meanwhile with the Federation distracted by Blake, a few planets declare independence, and the snow ball starts rolling. And it worked. Throughout series 4 we hear of planets be brought back under Federation control. Therefore they had chosen to be outside Federation control. Blake (with the unwitting help of the Americ...oops Andomedans, who came in right at the end) actually got what he wanted. Same it didn't last. Gnog. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:04:32 EST From: "J MacQueen" To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Better late than never Message-ID: <20000717230432.27747.qmail@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed >From: Pherber@aol.com >Hey, it sounds good to me -- hope you're planning to finish it! I did send a note asking people to ignore this, as it was sent by mistake , but it may not have got through to everyone - particularly Ika, who has a mailer daemon that keeps telling me my posts can't reach her because it takes more than 20 hops to do it (no, I don't understand, but someone will). I can just hear Orac saying something like that, can't you? Regards Joanne (back at work now) ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:41:20 +0100 From: "Nyder" To: "Neil Faulkner" , "b7" Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past Message-ID: <004701bff043$683a75c0$351286d4@stx.ox.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- Original Message ----- From: Neil Faulkner To: b7 Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 7:42 PM Subject: Re: [B7L] Revolutions past > From: Andrew Ellis > > > It's far easier to chant "Two world > > >wars and one world cup" than to face the fact that Britain has fought > three > > >world wars and failed to win any of them. > > > > > >Neil > > > > > > Erm, I am terminally stupid, but..... I don't speak French, Dutch or > German > > as my first language. > > Who said anything about losing? Simply being on the winning side is not, in > my book, grounds for claiming victory. Am I the only one who is totally failing to follow this conversation? Fiona Fiona Moore http://redrival.com/nyder/indexx.html Resist the Host or your Oneness will be Absorbed ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:09:31 EST From: "J MacQueen" To: blakes7@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: [B7L] Re: potential Gareth Thomas sighting Message-ID: <20000717230931.67920.qmail@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed >From: "Minnie" >I did a bad bad thing!! :( I remembered up until 10.00pm and I had the >video all set up and everything, then I took a phone call for a while then >went to bed and forgot about it. Bugger bugger bugger. I remembered this >morning when I got up. :(( I know exactly how you feel - I was up and in front of the television at the right time, only I happened to be trying to fix the tv channel settings on the video after a family member pressed the wrong button, and so I missed it. I suppose there's always next weekend - Rage's video playlists have been looking somewhat similar over the past few weeks... Regards Joanne ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com -------------------------------- End of blakes7-d Digest V00 Issue #204 **************************************